Legal Opinion

Druso v. Bank One of Columbus

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1997No. 71801PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Porter, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellants Daniel Druso and Thomas Unik, Jr. appeal from summary judgment entered in favor of defendants-appellees Bank One of Columbus, First National Bank of Ohio, and Morganstem, MacAdams & Draper Co., L.P.A., on plaintiffs’ claims that defendants honored a check on a forged indorsement and converted plaintiffs’ interests in the check. Plaintiffs claim that summary judgment was wrongfully entered against them and should have been entered in their favor as a matter of law. We find merit to the appeal and affirm in part and reverse and remand in part for…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Murphy v. City of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1992

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Leichliter v. Nat'l City Bank of ColumbusOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Smith v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Buyer's First Realty, Inc. v. Cleveland Area Board of RealtorsOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Krickler v. City of BrooklynOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Bosak v. H R Mason Contr., Inc., Unpublished Decision (12-20-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API