National Drill & Mfg. Co. v. Davis
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Woods County; R. H. Loofbourrow, Judge. Action by William. Davis against the National Drill & Manufacturing Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
On September 15, 1905, the defendant in error, as plaintiff, instituted an action against the plaintiff in error, as defendant, in the district court of Woods county, Oklahoma Territory, declaring in his petition upon a written contract, to recover the sum of $2,093, with interest from th§ 1st day of November, 1904, at the rate of seven per cent per annum, specially alleging that he had performed “all the obligations resting upon him under the terms'of his employment.”
Paragraph (j.) of said contract upon which he declared is in haec verba:
“Said second party agrees to guarantee every sale made…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wall v. County of MonroeSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Commissioners' Court v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Allen v. Comm'rs of Pittsburg CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Herron v. M. Rumley Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Grayson v. LathamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Jones v. Citizens' State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Dolezal v. BostickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Tate v. StoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Board of Cty. Comm. of Kay County v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.