Legal Opinion

Tomlinson v. City of Cincinnati

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1983No. 82-219PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPatton, J.

The first question presented for our determination is whether the court of appeals properly considered the affidavit of Angela Charron. Appellant argues that the court erred in relying upon this affidavit to reverse the decision of the trial court granting summary judgment because it contains only the opinions of the affiant, which appellant argues are inadmissible in evidence.1 We disagree for the reasons set forth below.

Civ. R. 56(E) prescribes the form affidavits must take when submitted with a motion for summary judgment:

“Supporting and opposing affidavits shall be made on personal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matkovich v. Penn Central Transportation Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Skinner v. Pennsylvania Rd. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933
  3. State ex rel. Ryland v. SchinkalOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Lewis v. Certified Oil Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Smiddy v. Wedding Party, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Turner v. TurnerOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Shinaver v. SzymanskiOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Ziegler v. Wendel Poultry Services, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Wall v. Firelands Radiology, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API