Legal Opinion

Baiko v. Mays

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 13, 2000No. 74905PublishedCited by 111 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Patricia Ann Blackmon, Judge.

In this appeal, the issue is whether a plaintiff in a malpractice action against both his lawyer and accountant is required as a matter of law to produce expert testimony on the standard of care to counter their denial that their action did not fall below the standard of care for their professions. Plaintiff appellant, Kenneth L. Baiko, argues that his case is different from the usual competency malpractice actions, which require expert testimony. He argues that he hired these professionals because of his suspicion that Dr. David Mays’s dental practice might not…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Smiddy v. Wedding Party, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Vahila v. HallOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Turner v. TurnerOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Pitts v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Supreme Court · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by111 opinions

  1. Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co. v. UngerOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Smith v. Gold-KaplanOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. All Star Land Title v. Surewin Invest., Unpublished Decision (11-2-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Tornado Technologies, Inc. v. Quality Control Inspection, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Lee v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2003

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API