Legal Opinion
Ford v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 25, 1954No. 1418-1420PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Associate Judge.
A jury in the Juvenile Court found appellant to be the father of three bastard children. He appeals from that finding and the subsequent order of the court requiring him to support the children.
This cause was previously before us in Ford v. District of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 96 A.2d 277.
*839At that time we awarded appellant a new trial because of the trial judge’s refusal to allow the defense counsel to testify in his client’s behalf.
Several errors are assigned on this appeal. Among those requiring discussion is one which relates to the right of the trial judge to explain…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Meyers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
- Anderson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
- Kelly v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
- Ford v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re UkwuDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Hemminger v. ScottDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
- District of Columbia v. United Jewish Appeal Federation of Greater Washington, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Duke v. American UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Mayle v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.