Legal Opinion

Kelly v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 22, 1954No. 1403PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge.

Appellant, defendant below, was convicted on four counts of keeping for sale and selling alcoholic beverages without a license in violation of D.C.Code 1951, § 25-109. Two assignments of error are presented on this appeal. The first relates to the- continuous possession of three bottles of whiskey, purchased and seized from defendant by the arresting officers. The second concerns the exhibition before the jury of numerous other bottles and cans, the contents of which' were not shown to contain alcohol.

The essential facts may b.e summarized as follows: On March 6, 1953,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Novak v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
  2. Taylor v. JamesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Loftus v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1921

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Bunter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Ford v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. Mayle v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. Ford v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API