Legal Opinion

Mayle v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 8, 1961No. 2692-2694PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted on two charges of disorderly conduct and one of intoxication. One of the grounds on which he urges reversal is based on the claim of double jeopardy: he says that the two. disorderly charges arose out of the same action. This question was not raised "'in the trial court and is not available to appellant here as grounds for reversal. Thomas v. District of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 161 A.2d 52; Ford v. District of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 102 A.2d 838, affirmed 95 U.S.App.D.C. 87, 219 F.2d 769, certiorari denied 349 U.S. 964, 75 S.Ct. 897, 99 L.Ed. 1286; Kelly…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davenport v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Ford v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Elijah M. Seidenberg v. Martha E. SeidenbergCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
  4. Kelly v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. Thomas v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re J. A. H.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Duncan v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Duke v. American UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Spears v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. In Re JAHDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API