Legal Opinion
Anderson v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 14, 1946No. Nos. 392-394PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Chief Judge.
Defendant appeals from the judgment and sentence on each of four counts of an information charging violation of the Female Eight Hour Law. Code 1940, § 36 — 301 et seq. Since the same points are involved in each appeal we granted appellant the right to consolidate two appeals of right with two appeals which we granted on application.1
The first three counts of the information charged that defendant, the owner of a drug store and lunch counter, worked certain female employees (1) for longer than eight hours on certain days, (2) for more than six days a week, and (3) for more…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Tayloe v. RiggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Fleming v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Keene v. MeadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Shreve v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Savage v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- Ford v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
- Packard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
- Jenkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
- Peeples v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.