Legal Opinion
Hemminger v. Scott
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 15, 1955No. 1586PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
'QUINN, Associate Judge. ■
This was a suit ■ for damages resulting, from an automobile collision. A finding and judgment were entered for plaintiff and defendant has'appealed. He contends that'the trial court erred:in admitting in. evidence a copy of a repair 'estimate-’concern-ing. data-ages sustained by plaintiff’s automobile.
The record in this case is most unsatisfactory; it reveals .only that defendant .objected on the theory that the exhibit was merely an estimate as distinguished from a paid bill. He stated that.he would attempt to prove that all items listed thereon were not caused by…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wright v. Capital Transit Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- Ford v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
3Cited by14 opinions
- Eureka Investment Corporation, N v. V. Chicago Title Insurance Company, Chicago Title Insurance Company v. Eureka Investment Corporation, N v. Eureka Investment Corporation, N v. V. Chicago Title Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- In Re UkwuDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Kakaes v. George Washington UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Roth v. SpeckDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- American Service Center Associates v. HeltonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.