Legal Opinion
Galob v. Village of Hibbing
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 26, 1973No. 42767PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Otis, Justice.
Plaintiff in this action seeks to recover attorney’s fees against the village of Hibbing for services he rendered in an injunction suit to restrain performance of a contract to purchase a generator for the village light plant. The trial court granted summary judgment for the defendant village and we affirm.
The history of these proceedings is set forth .in Hughes v. Micka, 269 Minn. 268, 130 N. W. 2d 505 (1964), and Galob v. Sanborn, 281 Minn. 58, 160 N. W. 2d 262 (1968). In the Hughes case various taxpayers brought an action to restrain the village and its Public Utilities…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cahn v. Town of HuntingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Hughes v. MickaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Galob v. SanbornSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Jerome v. BurnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- State ex rel. Finlayson v. GormanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stensland v. County of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Spaulding v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Spaulding v. BD. OF CTY. COM'RS, KANDIYOHI CTYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976