Legal Opinion

Spaulding v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 9, 1976No. 45639PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Douglas K. Amdahl, Justice.*

Appeal by Harvey Spaulding, retired sheriff of Kandiyohi County, from an order of the district court denying his alternative motion for amended findings or for a new trial after the court’s order dismissing Spaulding’s claim against the county for accrued sick leave.

Appellant was the sheriff of Kandiyohi County from January 3, 1958, to January 31, 1972. On February 6, 1968, a policy of employment was adopted by the Kandiyohi Board of County Commissioners. That policy included, among other employee benefits, a sick leave policy providing, so far as material here:

“All…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Board of Education of City of Minneapolis v. SandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. Jerome v. BurnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  3. Galob v. Village of HibbingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Axelson v. Minneapolis Teachers' Retirement Fund Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. Spaulding v. BD. OF CTY. COM'RS, KANDIYOHI CTYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. La Brosse v. Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Paske v. County of DakotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API