Legal Opinion
Strawbridge v. Sugar Mountain Resort, Inc.
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Decided January 31, 2003No. 5:02-cv-00092PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
THORNBURG, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the timely objections by Defendants B. Dale Stancil, The Sugar Mountain Irrevocable Trust, and The B. Dale Stancil Irrevocable Trust (“moving Defendants”) to the Memorandum and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Max 0. Cogburn, Jr. 1 The moving Defendants have collectively filed objections, while Defendant Sugar Mountain Resort has filed an answer, but no motions. Under 28 U.S.C. § 636, Plaintiffs had ten days to file their own objections, but failed to do so. The undersigned is not required to give…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Quintin Orpiano v. Gene M. Johnson, Warden W. P. Rodgers, Asst. Warden (Security) R. A. Clendenen Correctional CorporalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- Eloise HOWARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Peacock v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. ThornburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Glenn v. WagnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- State v. Ridgeway Brands Manufacturing, LLCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
- Inter-Tel Technologies, Inc. v. Linn Station Properties, LLCKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. Ridgeway BrandsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
- Landress v. Tier One Solar LLCDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2017
- Ross v. Washington Mutual BankDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2008
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.