Legal Opinion

Harrold v. Dowd

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 16, 2002No. COA01-529PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TYSON, Judge.

I. Facts

Blair Harrold, O.D. and Allan Barker, O.D. (collectively “plaintiffs”) are licensed optometrists practicing in Nash County, North Carolina. Plaintiffs engaged Richard C. Dowd and Ernst & Young, LLP (collectively “defendants”) to advise them on business opportunities, including mergers and acquisitions.

In 1995, plaintiffs received a merger proposal from PrimeVision Health, Inc. (“PrimeVision”). Defendants initially advised plaintiffs against the merger. After investigating the merger proposal, defendants later advised plaintiffs to consider the proposal. Plaintiffs agreed…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ragsdale v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Terry v. TerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Barger v. McCoy Hillard & ParksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  4. Oates v. Jag, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Raritan River Steel Co. v. Cherry, Bekaert & HollandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Leary v. N.C. Forest Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  2. CommScope Credit Union v. Butler & Burke, LLPSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
  3. Birtha v. Stonemor, North Carolina, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  4. Kaleel Builders, Inc. v. AshbyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  5. McKinnon v. CV INDUSTRIES, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API