Legal Opinion
Northeast Savings, F.A. v. Scherban
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 2, 1997No. AC 16705PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HENNESSY, J.
The defendants Jack Scherban and Andrea Scherban1 appeal from the judgment of strict foreclosure rendered by the trial court for the plaintiff, Northeast Savings. The defendants raise the following issues on appeal: (1) the plaintiff failed to provide sufficient notice of the acceleration of the debt; (2) the trial court improperly held a supplemental hearing and issued a judgment more than 120 days after the original *227close of evidence; (3) the plaintiff violated General Statutes § 49-6d; and (4) the plaintiff violated the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq. We…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. HolmquistSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Toffolon v. Town of AvonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Frank v. StreeterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Wood v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Weinstein v. WeinsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Franklin Credit Management Corp. v. NicholasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Webster Bank v. OakleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Bank of America, FSB v. HanlonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Cowles v. CowlesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.