Legal Opinion
United States v. Justin Call
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 3, 1997No. 94-2229PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
A jury convicted Defendant Justin Call of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Defendant was sentenced to 63 months imprisonment. This direct appeal followed. In his appeal, Defendant argues that the district court erred by excluding proffered expert testimony regarding the results of his polygraph test. Specifically, Defendant argues that the district court failed to apply the analysis set forth in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- In Re David L. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Miriam Henao Posado, Pablo Ramirez and Irma Clemencia HurtadoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. CordobaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- United States v. NacchioCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. McVeighCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Goebel v. Denver & Rio Grande Western RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Miller v. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.