Legal Opinion

Best v. Duke University

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 16, 1993No. 9214SC1016PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREENE, Judge.

Herman Best (plaintiff) brought the instant action against Duke University (defendant) and asserted causes of action for malicious prosecution, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent infliction of emotional distress, and punitive damages. At the close of the plaintiff’s evidence, defendant moved for directed verdict as to all of plaintiff’s claims. The motions were granted for intentional infliction of emotional distress and punitive damages. The claims for malicious prosecution and negligent infliction of emotional distress were submitted to the jury which…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Ruark Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates, P.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Waddle v. SparksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Briggs v. RosenthalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Hawkins v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Exxon Corp. v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Best v. Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. Moore v. City of CreedmoorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  3. Beroth Oil Co. v. WhiteheartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. Best v. Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Best v. Duke UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API