Briggs v. Rosenthal
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
The sole issue before us is whether the trial judge erred in dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint pursuant to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 12(b)(6). A complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim, unless it appears beyond doubt that plaintiff can prove no set of facts which would entitle him to relief. Sutton v. Duke, 277 N.C. 94, 176 S.E. 2d 161 (1970). A complaint must be dismissed when on its face it appears that no law supports it, that some essential fact is missing, or that some disclosed fact defeats it. Mumford v. Hutton & Bourbonnais Co., 47 N.C. App. 440, 267 S.E. 2d…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Fry v. Ionia Sentinel-StandardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Morrow v. Kings Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Harris v. NCNB National Bank of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Johnson v. BollingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Johnson v. BollingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Wagoner v. Elkin City Schools' Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Guthrie v. ConroyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.