Legal Opinion
Chitsazzadeh v. Kramer & Kaslow
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 27, 2011No. B222988PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
Kramer & Kaslow, Philip A. Kramer and John S. Birke (collectively Defendants) appeal an order striking their special motion to strike (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16)1 and awarding $900 in attorney fees to Mohammad Chitsazzadeh and Mansoureh Shajari (collectively Plaintiffs) as prevailing plaintiffs on the motion. The trial court found that Defendants filed the special motion to strike more than 60 days after service of the complaint and therefore granted Plaintiffs’ request to strike the motion as untimely under section 425.16, subdivision (f). The court also found that the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Rusheen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Moore v. ShawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Lam v. NgoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Oracle Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Nunez v. PennisiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Phyllis Bradbury v. City of EastportSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
- Symmonds v. Mahoney, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Cal. Alliance of Acupuncture Medicine v. Wong CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.