Legal Opinion

W. Ross Campbell Co. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 20, 1934No. Docket No. 8171PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, J., pro tem.

Suit was brought by plaintiff to recover a balance of $3,500 on an earned commission of $8,500. It was admitted that defendant agreed in writing to pay the total commission of $8,500 and that but $5,000 thereof was actually paid. Defendant set up as an affirmative defense that the purchaser to whom the property was sold, on which sale the commission was earned, defaulted and refused to perform its obligation to purchase and asked to be relieved from such obligation. This was agreed to by defendant, providing the latter was released from paying the balance of such…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Llewellyn Iron Works v. Abbott Kidney Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Arnold v. ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Hunt v. L. M. Field, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Stewart v. CrowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Kullman, Salz & Co. v. Sugar Apparatus Mfg. Co.California Supreme Court · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Skrbina v. Fleming Companies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. Abbot v. StevensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Cobbs v. CobbsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Crow v. PEG Construction Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Lamb Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API