Legal Opinion

Fred O. Watson Co. v. United States Life Insurance Co. of New York

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 23, 1977No. 47418-9PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Justice.

Defendant appeals from an order which denied its motion for a new trial, and from the judgment granting plaintiffs specific performance of a standby purchase commitment. Plaintiffs seek review of the judgment insofar as it denies recovery of costs occasioned by defendant’s failure to perform. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Plaintiffs seek specific performance of an agreement between plaintiff Fred. 0. Watson Company (Watson) and defendant United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York. The agreement, a standby commitment 1 dated December 14, 1971, provided…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  2. Johnson v. FrebergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. Shikes v. GabelnickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  4. In Re Trust Under Will of ComstockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  5. Ross v. CarrollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Medtronic, Inc. v. Advanced Bionics Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  2. Flynn v. SawyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Home Insurance Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance of PittsburghSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  4. Schumacher v. IhrkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  5. Cargill, Inc. v. Ace American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API