Legal Opinion
Cox v. Cook
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 1, 1944No. 1 Div. 209PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
Suit in ejectment seeking the settlement of a disputed boundary line of land, by the pleading before us. The plea was not guilty and a suggestion of the true boundary as follows:
“Now comes the Defendant and suggests in writing that this suit arises over a disputed boundary line between the property of the Plaintiff and the Defendant. The Defendant alleges that the true location of the boundary line separating the property of the Plaintiff and the Defendant is a line running East and West six feet South of the South line of the following described tract of land situated in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Smith v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Smith v. BachusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Pounders v. NixSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Smith v. EudySupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Forrester v. McFrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Calvert v. BynumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Mintz v. MillicanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Godsey v. AnglinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954