Legal Opinion

Forrester v. McFry

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 11, 1934No. 7 Div. 256PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

Appellee moves to strike from the bill of exceptions certain instruments designated as exhibits to it. In the body of the bill of exceptions they are referred to and alleged to be attached and marked as Exhibits A to P, each respectively and separately. They are so marked. There is nothing to indicate that they were not so attached and marked at the time the judge approved the bill.

When the bill contains a memorandum directing the clerk to copy a certain document, the memorandum must describe the document so that it may by such description, taken by itself, be identified by…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Smith v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Smith v. BachusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  3. Hardie-Tynes Mfg. Co. v. CruiseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  4. Yauger v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. Hopkins v. DuggarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Chandler v. OwensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. Guy v. LancasterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  3. Denton v. CorrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. Mintz v. MillicanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  5. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. DeeseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API