Legal Opinion
Calvert v. Bynum
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided February 15, 1951No. 6 Div. 54PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAWSON, Justice.
This is a statutory action in the nature of ejectment by J. H. Calvert against J. L. Bynum.
The suit was to’ recover possession of land described in the complaint as follows: “Lots Numbers one (1), two (2), three (3), four (4), and five (5) in Block Number six (6) and also that part of Block six (6) marked on the Map of Pinehurst as 'Reserved’ according to map and survey of Pinehurst Addition to Town of Oneonta, Alabama.”
Defendant, pursuant to § 942, Title 7, Code 1940, suggested that the suit arose over a disputed boundary line, and described the location of the line claimed…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Copeland v. WarrenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Ogburn-Griffin Gro. Co. v. Orient InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Walls v. Decatur Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Spragins v. FitcheardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Hill v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Mobile City Lines, Inc. v. ProctorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Grayco Resources, Inc. v. PooleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. DoddSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
- Proctor Agency, Inc. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.