Legal Opinion

Mintz v. Millican

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 10, 1946No. 7 Div. 869PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWSON, Justice.

This is a statutory action in the nature of ejectment by A. C. Mintz against Lola Mae Cox Millican, R. J. Millican and A. L. Dooley.

The defendants, pursuant to § 942, Title 7, Code 1940, filed a plea of disclaimer and made suggestion in writing that the suit arose over a disputed boundary line, and described the location of the line as claimed by them by landmarks, monuments, courses and distances, averring that such line was all in accordance with the original government survey. Plaintiff by replication described the location of the boundary line as claimed by him, using…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Smith v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Yauger v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Oliver v. OliverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  4. Wade v. GilmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  5. Mink v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Calvert v. BynumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  2. Guy v. LancasterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  3. Denton v. CorrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. Mintz v. MillicanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  5. Millican v. MintzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API