Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Ferguson

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided October 18, 2022No. 3:22-cv-05403Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 GABRIELLA SULLIVAN et al., CASE NO. 3:22-cv-05403-DGE 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING ALLIANCE 12 v. FOR GUN RESPONSIBILITY’S MOTION TO INTERVENE AS A 13 BOB FERGUSON et al., DEFENDANT 14 Defendants. 15 16 I INTRODUCTION 17 This matter comes before the Court on Movant Alliance for Gun Responsibility’s 18 (“Alliance”) Motion to Intervene as a Defendant (Dkt. No. 45). The Court has considered the 19 pleadings and hereby DENIES Alliance’s motion to intervene pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 20 Procedure…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Stauffer Chemical Company, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance Company, Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Monsanto Company Reichhold Limited Fmc Corporation Bridgestone/firestone, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. United States v. Alisal Water Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Nancy Anne Spangler, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee v. Pasadena City Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  4. Citizens for Balanced Use v. Montana Wilderness Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Department of Fair Employment & Housing v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API