Legal Opinion
Citizens for Balanced Use v. Montana Wilderness Ass'n
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 26, 2011No. 10-35823PublishedCited by 142 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOULD, Circuit Judge:
Three conservation groups, Montana Wilderness Association, Greater Yellowstone Coalition, and The Wilderness Society (collectively, “Applicants”) appeal from the denial of their motion to intervene on the side of the defendants in an action brought by Citizens for Balanced Use (“CBU”) against Mary Erickson, in her official capacity as Supervisor of the Gallatin National Forest, and the United States Forest Service (“Forest Service”). In the underlying action, CBU challenged an interim order issued by the Forest Service in response to an adverse decision in prior…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Trbovich v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Utah Ass'n of Counties v. ClintonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Sagebrush Rebellion, Inc. v. WattCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Prete v. BradburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Arakaki v. CayetanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by142 opinions
- Michael Chamness v. Abel MaldonadoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Western Watersheds Project v. Deb HaalandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Wolfsen Land & Cattle Co v. Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's AssociationsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Robert Ito Farm, Inc. v. County of MauiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- In re Facebook, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
137 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.