Legal Opinion
Department of Fair Employment & Housing v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 26, 2011No. 09-15057, 09-15060PublishedCited by 142 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge RESTANI; Dissent by Judge IKUTA.
OPINION
RESTANI, Judge:
Plaintiff Department of Fair Employment and Housing (“DFEH”) and Plaintiff-Intervenor Steven J. Carauddo appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant Lucent Technologies, Inc. (“Lucent”), Carauddo’s former employer, on claims that he was terminated in violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”). In addition, DFEH challenges the district court’s finding of diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 and Carauddo challenges the district court’s denial of his motion to…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- US Airways, Inc. v. BarnettSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by142 opinions
- Nevada v. Bank of America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Cynthia Lawler v. Montblanc North America, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Harvinder Singh v. American Honda Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Joan Demarest v. HSBC Bank USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Charles Merrick v. Hilton Worldwide, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
137 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.