Legal Opinion
Gilman v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 3, 1953No. 13305_1PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Circuit Judge.
The question presented by this appeal is whether the United States, after suffering judgment against it under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1346(b), for injuries arising from the negligent operation of a government automobile, may recover, by way of indemnity, the amount of such judgment from its employee, the driver who was guilty of the negligence which caused the injuries.
Appellee Darnell brought the original action against the United States to recover damages for injuries arising when his automobile collided with a government car driven by the appellant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. Standard Oil Co. Of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Washington Gas Light Co. v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States v. Lushbough Hoffman v. LushboughCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. GilmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Ronnie Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Graham v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Jose Serra, Cross-Appellant v. Paul A. Pichardo, Cross-Appellee, Robert Elsea, Defendant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Robert Arevalo v. Chuck WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.