Legal Opinion

United States v. Gilman

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 17, 1954No. 449PublishedCited by 146 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas

The single question in the case is whether the United States may recover indemnity from one of its employees after it has been held liable under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 1 60 Stat. 842, 28 U. S. C. §§ 1346, 2671 et seq., for the negligence of the employee.

Respondent, an employee of the United States, had a collision with the car of one Darnell, while respondent was driving a government automobile. Darnell sued the United States under the Tort Claims Act. The United States filed a third-party complaint against respondent, asking that if it should be held liable to Darnell, it have…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. United States v. Standard Oil Co. Of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Gilman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953

3Cited by146 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Ziglar v. AbbasiSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  3. Bush v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Transport Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API