United States v. Yellow Cab Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burton
The question presented is whether the Federal Tort Claims Act 1 empowers a United States District Court to require the United States to be impleaded as a third-party defendant and to answer the claim of a joint tort-feasor for contribution as if the United States were a private individual. For the reasons hereinafter stated, we hold that it does.
No. 218 — Yellow Cab Case.
December 1, 1946, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, four passengers in a taxicab were injured by a collision between the cab and a United States mail truck. Claiming diversity of citizenship and charging negligence on the part…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Brooks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Anderson v. John L. Hayes Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Fisher v. DiehlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by431 opinions
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Transport Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
426 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.