Legal Opinion

United States v. Yellow Cab Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 26, 1951No. 218PublishedCited by 431 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burton

The question presented is whether the Federal Tort Claims Act 1 empowers a United States District Court to require the United States to be impleaded as a third-party defendant and to answer the claim of a joint tort-feasor for contribution as if the United States were a private individual. For the reasons hereinafter stated, we hold that it does.

No. 218 — Yellow Cab Case.

December 1, 1946, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, four passengers in a taxicab were injured by a collision between the cab and a United States mail truck. Claiming diversity of citizenship and charging negligence on the part…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. United States v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Brooks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Anderson v. John L. Hayes Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. Fisher v. DiehlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by431 opinions

  1. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Transport Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

426 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API