Legal Opinion

Crowe v. Domestic Loans, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 26, 1963No. 18061PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moss, Justice.

Daniel C. Crowe, the respondent herein, brought this action against Domestic Loans, Inc., the appellant herein, and Lenders, Inc. of West Columbia, to recover damages for alleged wrongful interference with his contractual relation with Eckerd’s Drug Stores. The appellant demurred to the complaint on the ground that there was no allegation therein of concerted, action by it with Lenders, Inc. of West Columbia, and no allegation showing that the independent acts combined and concurred in causing injury to the respondent. The Trial Judge overruled the demurrer of the appellant and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matthews v. Seaboard Air Line RailwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  2. Pendleton v. Columbia Ry., G. E. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  3. Chitwood v. McMillanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  4. Warr v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  5. Hollifield v. KellerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Russell v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. Love v. GambleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  3. Bocook Outdoor Media, Inc. v. Summey Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  4. Smith v. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  5. Rourk Ex Rel. Rourk v. SelveySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API