Legal Opinion

Love v. Gamble

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided August 15, 1994No. 2214PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

This case involves the growing, buying and selling of cucumbers for the production of pickles. The appellants (the Loves) sued the respondents (Sardinia and Vlasic) for breach of contract, interference with and wrongful termination of an agency relationship, and interference with a prospective contractual advantage. At the close of the evidence, the trial judge granted a directed verdict to the respondents on the issue of liability on all causes of action. We affirm. Accordingly, we do not reach the damages issue raised by the Loves.

FACTS

Vlasic Foods, Inc. buys cucumbers…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Duggin v. AdamsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  2. Todd v. South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Crandall Corp. v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  4. Fontaine v. PeitzSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  5. State Ex Rel. McLeod v. C & L CORP. INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ecclesiastes Production Ministries v. Outparcel Associates, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  2. United Educational Distributors, LLC v. Educational Testing ServiceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Santoro v. SCHULTHESSCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  4. Royal Insurance Co. of America v. Reliance InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2001
  5. The Huffines Co., LLC v. LockhartCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API