Legal Opinion

Chitwood v. McMillan

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 1, 1939No. 14812PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Fishburne.

The cause of action alleged is respondent’s tortious and malicious interference with the contractual relations of the appellant with William E. Bowe, Jr., a road contractor. The appellant suffered a nonsuit and he appeals.

It appears that some time in August, 1936, a contract was awarded to William F. Bowe, Jr., by the South Carolina State Highway Department for certain road construction work in Kershaw County. This contract provided among other things for the removal of buildings and structures from the right of way; and Bowe…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Angle v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Raymond v. YarringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Sorenson v. Chevrolet Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. Good v. JarrardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
  5. Tolar v. FunderburkeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Barnes Group, Inc. v. C & C Products, Inc., and Roy E. McGuireCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  2. Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  3. Patterson v. BoganSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  4. Wayne Smith Construction Co. v. Wolman, Duberstein, & ThompsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  5. Love v. GambleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API