Tully v. Tully
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. H. V. Morehouse, F. J. Hambly, D. W. Herrington, and D. W. Burchard, for Appellants. Nicholas Bowden, Archer & Archer, and S. F. Leib, for Respondents.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
The court below sustained a demurrer to the third amended complaint. Upon the plaintiffs declining to further amend, judgment was entered in favor of the defendants. Prom this judgment the appeal is taken, accompanied by a bill of exceptions. The grounds of the demurrer were: 1. That the facts stated in the complaint do not state a cause of action; and 2. That the action is barred by the statute of limitations.
From the complaint it appears that the plaintiff Sarah G-. Tully married John Tully, deceased, February 29, 1884; said Tully at the time was a widower, and the defendants, except…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Murray v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- City of San Francisco v. LawtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Broder v. ConklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Robinson v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Peiser v. GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Clopton v. CloptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Holland v. McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Shiels v. NathanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Johnson v. RutherfordNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
- Richardson v. MichelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.