Lexington Education Ass'n v. Town of Lexington
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.
The question in this case is whether, by reason of the definition of the word “employee” in G. L. c. 32B, § 2(d), a municipality is foreclosed from requiring of its employees more than twenty hours of service per week as a qualification for coverage under the municipality’s group insurance plan. The town of Lexington takes the position that the statute sets a twenty-hour minimum requirement for coverage, above which municipalities are free to set their own standards. Lexington’s policy is to provide coverage for employees who work at least twenty-five hours per week. The Lexington Education…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Wellesley College v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Cleary v. Cardullo's, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Sears v. Treasurer & Receiver GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Amherst-Pelham Regional School Committee v. Department of EducationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Long v. WickettMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
- Galenski v. Town of ErvingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- Retirement Board of Stoneham v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
- Bristol County Retirement Board v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
- Woods v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF COMMUNITIES & DEVELOPMENTMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.