State v. Smith
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RYAN, Justice.
¶ 1 This case requires us to decide if a defendant’s claim that prior felony convictions from other jurisdictions are legally insufficient for sentence enhancement purposes can be reviewed on appeal when he did not preserve the claim in the trial court. We hold that despite the lack of a timely objection, such a claim is reviewable for fundamental error.
I
¶2 A jury convicted Charles Eugene Smith of one count of theft of means of transportation, a class three felony, and armed robbery, a class two dangerous felony. The State alleged three prior felony convictions for…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. StroudArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. LoganArizona Supreme Court · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Shawna FordeArizona Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. BearupArizona Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- State of Arizona v. Rohan Livingston ButlerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.