Legal Opinion

In Re Quackenbush

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 2001No. 68566-5PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

16 P.3d 638 (2001)

142 Wash.2d 928

In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of Larry A. QUACKENBUSH, Petitioner.

No. 68566-5.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued June 22, 2000.

Decided February 1, 2001.

Nielsen, Broman & Associates, Eric Broman, Eric Nielsen, Seattle, for Petitioner.

Christine Gregoire, Atty. Gen., Heather Klein, Asst. Atty. Gen., Olympia, for Respondent.

MADSEN, J.

In this personal restrain petition, petitioner Larry Quackenbush challenges the authority of the Indeterminate Sentence Review Board (Board) to rescind its final discharge order under the 1993 amendment to the final…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Davis v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Millay v. CamWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. National Electrical Contractors Ass'n v. RivelandWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Millay v. CamWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Woodson v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. RoggenkampWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. RoggenkampWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. RoggenkampCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  4. State v. RoggenkampCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. Elizabeth Cito v. Jennifer K. Rios And John Doe RiosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API