Legal Opinion

State v. Roggenkamp

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 3, 2003No. 48718-3-IPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Schindler, J. —

Michael Roggenkamp was convicted of two counts of vehicular assault and one count of vehicular homicide in juvenile court. He argues that his conviction must be reversed because the trial court used the incorrect definition of “reckless” for the vehicular assault and vehicular homicide statutes and because the actions of the other driver were the superseding cause of the accident. He also argues that the trial court failed to enter findings on ultimate facts as required by JuCR 7.11(d). Finding no error, we affirm.

FACTS

The motor vehicle accident occurred about an hour before…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. State v. McCullumWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. AlvarezWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. JudgeWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. In Re the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of SantoreCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  5. Crowe v. GastonWashington Supreme Court · 1998

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. RoggenkampWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. RoggenkampWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. RoggenkampCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  4. State v. Mee Hui KimCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. State v. Mee Hui KimCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API