Legal Opinion

Fairchild Camera & Instrument Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 26, 1964No. C.D. 2486PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OliveR, Chief Judge:

This protest involves certain merchandise that was assessed with duty at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 1551 of the Tariff Act of 1930 for photographic cameras. Plaintiffs’ principal claim, and the one to which all of plaintiffs’ proof is directed and upon which counsel’s argument is based, is for duty at the rate of 8% per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 353 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 54108, for parts of electrical X-ray apparatus, instruments (other than laboratory), and devices, finished or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Westinghouse Electric International Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  2. Fairchild Camera & Instrument Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Astra Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Fairchild Camera & Instrument Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API