Legal Opinion

Fairchild Camera & Instrument Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 5, 1961No. 65745; protest 319849-K (New York)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This protest relates to certain merchandise that was assessed with duty at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 1551 of the Tariff Act of 1930 for photographic cameras.

Plaintiffs make several claims. All of them invoke paragraph 353 of the Tariff Act of 1930, which, as originally enacted, reads as follows:

Par. 353. All articles suitable for producing, rectifying, modifying, controlling, or distributing electrical energy;

electrical telegraph (including printing and typewriting), telephone, signaling, radio, welding, ignition, wiring,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Westinghouse Electric International Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  2. M. B. I. Export & Import, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fairchild Camera & Instrument Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  2. Fairchild Camera & Instrument Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API