Fairchild Camera & Instrument Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Oliver, Chief Judge:
This protest relates to certain merchandise that was assessed with duty at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 1551 of the Tariff Act of 1930 for photographic cameras.
Plaintiffs make several claims. All of them invoke paragraph 353 of the Tariff Act of 1930, which, as originally enacted, reads as follows:
Par. 353. All articles suitable for producing, rectifying, modifying, controlling, or distributing electrical energy;
electrical telegraph (including printing and typewriting), telephone, signaling, radio, welding, ignition, wiring,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Westinghouse Electric International Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
- M. B. I. Export & Import, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fairchild Camera & Instrument Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
- Fairchild Camera & Instrument Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964