Legal Opinion

Ford v. Providence Washington Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 3, 1957No. Civ. 17254PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

Defendant appeals from plaintiff’s judgment for $5,306.97.

Questions Presented

1. May an insurer under a public liability policy covering the owner and the operator of an automobile, question in an action on the policy the implied finding of a jury in a personal injury action as to the person operating the automobile ?

2. Does the good faith denial of drivership by a person whom a jury in a personal injury action impliedly finds to be the driver, and his failure to ask defense of the insurer, release the insurer of all obligations under the policy?

Record

Defendant issued to Peter Cardinale a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lamb v. Belt Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. Hynding v. Home Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. O'MORROW v. BoradCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Valladao v. Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Bachman v. Independence Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Hogan v. Midland National InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Samson v. Transamerica InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Maxon v. Security Insurance of New Haven ConnecticutCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Shapiro v. Republic Indemnity Co. of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API