Legal Opinion

Valladao v. Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1939No. Sac. 5248PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

The facts underlying this litigation are not in serious dispute and are practically conceded. It will facilitate matters, therefore, if we adopt, and' we do adopt, the following rather full statement of facts heretofore employed in an opinion of the District Court of Appeal of the Third Appellate District when the cause was there pending:

“These actions were jointly brought by the plaintiffs against the Fireman’s Fund Indemnity Company, a corporation, pursuant to the provisions of the statutes of 1919, chapter 367, being an action after judgments obtained by the plaintiffs against the assureds…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Hynding v. Home Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Francis v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1927
  4. Seltzer v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. Jefferson Realty Co. v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Campbell v. Allstate Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. Of Detroit, Mich. v. Winget Winget v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. Of Detroit, MichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  4. O'MORROW v. BoradCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Allstate Insurance v. KellerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API