Legal Opinion

Universal Underwriters Insurance v. Allstate Insurance

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 7, 1991No. 90-081PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.

The defendant, Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate), appeals the decision of the Superior Court {Goode, J.) in a declaratory judgment action filed by the plaintiff, Universal Underwriters Insurance Company (Universal), requesting a declaration of Allstate’s obligation to share responsibility, where there were two insurance policies covering a single accident. Allstate argues that the trial court erred when it ruled that Allstate was obligated to share defense and indemnity expenses with Universal on a pro rata basis. For the reasons that follow, we reverse.

The facts are not in dispute. On…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ellis v. Royal InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  2. Zurich Insurance v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  3. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Home Insurance Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  4. Peerless Insurance v. VigueSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  5. Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Canal Insurance v. Carolina Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  2. American Casualty Co. of Reading v. Phico InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Peerless Insurance v. Vermont Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  4. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  5. Old Republic Insurance Co. v. Stratford Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API