Legal Opinion

Universal Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Travelers Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided September 29, 1995No. 57, 1995PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALSH, Justice:

In this appeal from the Superior Court, we consider the question of whether, and to what extent, a liability insurance carrier may invoke an automobile-business exclusion clause under Delaware’s mandatory insurance law. The Superior Court ruled that such an exclusion is valid for coverage beyond the statutory mandatory minimum. On a related question, the Superior Court ruled that a carrier whose coverage is limited to mandatory limits must share the cost of defense equally with an excess carrier. We affirm both rulings.

I

The factual scenario underlying this dispute between…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Crothall-American, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WagamonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  3. Hudson v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  4. American Home Assur. Co. v. Hartford Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
  5. Bass v. Horizon Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In Re Santa Fe Pacific Corp. Shareholder LitigationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  2. RBC Capital Markets, LLC v. JervisSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Sensebe v. Canal Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
  5. National Union Fire Insurance v. FisherSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API