Legal Opinion

Peerless Insurance v. Vermont Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 24, 2004No. 2003-164PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.

This is an appeal by the defendants, Vermont Mutual Insurance Company (Vermont Mutual) and Guumeez-Hill Trust (Guumeez-Hill), from a decree in a declaratory judgment action filed by the plaintiffs, Peerless Insurance (Peerless) and Red Oak Property Management, Inc. (Red Oak), to determine priority of coverage and defense obligations. The Superior Court {Barry, J.) granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on both issues and denied the defendants’ cross-motion for summary judgment. We issued an opinion, on February 3, 2004, reversing the superior court. Peerless filed a motion for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Home Insurance Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  2. Universal Underwriters Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  3. Redeemer Covenant Church of Brooklyn Park v. Church Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  4. Godbout v. Lloyd's Insurance Syndicates Messrs. Mendes & MountSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  5. Pro Con Construction, Inc. v. Acadia InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Van Der Stok v. Van VoorheesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  2. Wilson v. Progressive Northern InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  3. Philbrick v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  4. Broom v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  5. Miller v. Amica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API