Legal Opinion

Caldwell v. UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 29, 2020No. 4:19-cv-02861Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 MARY CALDWELL, 6 Plaintiff, No. C 19-2861 WHA 7 v. 8 UNITEDHEALTHCARE INSURANCE ORDER ON 76 MOTION FOR CLASS COMPANY, et al., CERTIFICATION 9 Defendants. 10 11 12 INTRODUCTION 13 In this putative class action to recover health benefits under an ERISA plan, plaintiff 14 insured moves for certification of a class under Rule 23(b)(1) and Rule 23(b)(2). Defendant 15 insurers oppose. To the extent stated herein, plaintiff’s motion is granted. 16 STATEMENT 17 Plaintiff Mary Caldwell brought this action on behalf of herself and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. David Hanon v. Dataproducts Corporation Jack C. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API