Legal Opinion
Wit v. United Behavioral Health
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 19, 2016No. Case No. 14-cv-02346 JCS; Related Case No. 14-cv-05337 JCSPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
JOSEPH C. SPERO, Chief Magistrate Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs in these putative class actions allege that they were improperly denied coverage for mental health and substance use disorder treatment by Defendant United Behavioral Health (“UBH”), which administers mental health and substance use disorder benefits under their health insurance plans. In Wit v. United Behavioral Health, Case No. 14-cv-02346 JCS (hereinafter, “Wit”), Plaintiffs allege that they were wrongfully denied coverage for mental health and substance use-related residential…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Des Roches v. California Physicians' ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Briscoe v. Health Care Services CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
- Condry v. UnitedHealth Group Inc.,et.alDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Foster v. Adams and Associates, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Kevin Risto v. Screen Actors Guild - American Federation of Television and Radio ArtistsDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.