Legal Opinion
Ryan v. Mike-Ron Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 30, 1964No. Civ. 7161PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN (Gerald), J.
This is an action to recover a deficiency on a conditional sales contract and to foreclose a chattel mortgage, On September 22, 1959, Raymond J. Ryan and Helen Ryan, plaintiffs and respondents (hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs) agreed to sell and Mike-Ron Corp., Inc., defendant and appellant (hereinafter referred to as Mike-Ron) agreed to buy 23 items of personal property for a price of $100,000. A promissory note in the amount of the contract price was executed by Mike-Ron and guaranteed by defendant and appellant Stanley A. Tanner (hereinafter referred to as Tanner).…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Stasher v. Harger-HaldemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Norris v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Alderson v. HoustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. KyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Keene v. HarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- George M. Hedla, Etc. v. Blaine McCool Etc., George M. Hedla, Etc. v. Blaine McCool Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Ryan v. Mike-Ron Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Cappa v. Oscar C. Holmes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972
- Alpine Insurance v. PlanchonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.