Legal Opinion

Alpine Insurance v. Planchon

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 25, 1999No. A082545PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1318Opinion

POCHÉ, Acting P. J.

At the heart of this insurer/insured dispute is a standard pickup truck modified with a hydraulic scissors lift, a device that raises and lowers a container called a “bed.” The issue presented is whether this vehicle so modified is an “auto” or “mobile equipment” for purposes of a commercial general liability policy. We agree with the trial court’s conclusion that the pickup is “mobile equipment,” and therefore not an excluded peril.

Background

The vehicle at issue is owned by defendants Russell Planchón, Paul Planchón, and their company, Planchón Roofing & Siding…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Aydin Corp. v. First State InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Winograd v. American Broadcasting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Southern Pac. R.R. v. DufourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. American Star Insurance Co. v. Insurance Co. of the WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Scheenstra v. California Dairies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Hartford Casualty Insurance v. EwanDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2012
  3. American States Insurance v. Travelers Property Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Swiderski v. MILBERG WEISSCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Great American Insurance Company v. Revolutionary Productions Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API