Legal Opinion
Brune v. Morse
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided February 4, 1972No. 71 C 275(4)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
339 F.Supp. 159 (1972)
Arthur BRUNE, Plaintiff,
v.
Charles J. MORSE et al., Defendants.
No. 71 C 275(4).
United States District Court, E. D. Missouri, E. D.
February 4, 1972.
Burton H. Shostak, Kramer, Chused & Kramer, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff.
Wiley, Craig, Armbruster & Wilburn, St. Louis, Mo., for defendants.
MEMORANDUM
WANGELIN, District Judge.
This is a suit for declaratory judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201 and Rule 57, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, brought under Section 301 of the Taft-Hartley Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185(a) to determine plaintiff's rights to funds under a union pension trust.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Dessen v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1937
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lillian Yanks Rehmar v. Bernard L. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Alvares v. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Alvares v. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Arthur Brune v. Charles J. MorseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- Meehan v. Laborers Pension FundDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1976